Integrate the verified Section 9 stack into the full 625 audit frontier - #40
Merged
SamPetkov merged 47 commits intoJul 25, 2026
Conversation
SamPetkov
merged commit Jul 25, 2026
ce77809
into
agent/625-full-proof-audit-frontier
7 checks passed
This was referenced Jul 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mechanical integration PR only.
This merges the Section 9 stack from PRs #34, #35, and #37 into
agent/625-full-proof-audit-frontier, which is the head of audit PR #39. The purpose is to make #39 a genuine cumulative review branch containing both the Section 8 and Section 9 simplification lines.The q-only focused target is green at
2ea82c988218dee89d3639f598090ce813501c40. This merge does not claim Proposition 9.2 or the final Erdős 625 theorem; the global Section 8 physical assembly and the final Section 8/9 normalized-moment bridge remain explicit proof obligations in #39.